|
|
Vir Afrikaanse artikel
kliek hier
Six important directives by which to test a
Revival Preacher or Evangelist!
From time to time a new prophet / preacher appears on
the horizon. Not always someone that can be described as a 'hard cult -'
or an extremist figure, who renounces the basic truths of the Bible such
as the Deity of Christ, His resurrection and the Bible. It is not
someone like Sun Myung Moon (known as the Moonies in America) who
regarded himself as exclusive, a mediator or as a god. It is not someone
like the "prophet Joshua" of a while ago who clearly worked wilfully
unscripturally and misled many. The assault is much more subtle.
Because God appointed us as 'testers' (Jer.6:27; 1
John 4:1) it now needs finer discernment. It is expected of everyone to
look and listen more carefully. What do the people who attend the
services talk about? What impressed them? What experience appealed to
them? Why was it so wonderful to be in the services? What struck them,
and what does this person talk about? Listen well to what it is that
makes them excited, because that might say a great deal about the
preacher.
Christians want to know: "How can an evangelist be
evaluated?" Here are a number of questions which could help as a general
guideline to test itinerant preachers.
Test by means of the following questions:
1. Is Jesus depicted as though He has just now
been crucified among us?
Most naïve Christians are satisfied if the name of
Jesus is scattered plentifully like confetti during a sermon. The name
of Jesus is sometimes used alternatively for God without the focus
genuinely coming onto Jesus and His work of redemption. If the name of
Jesus is replaced by the name of God in the sermon, there would be no
change of the message of the sermon. Others speak about ‘the Lord’, a
Lord so vague that no-one can distinguish which 'Lord' is being referred
to. There are many 'Lords'! Is it Lord Hare Krishna, Lord Allah, or is
it the Lord Jesus Christ?
When one listens superficially everything sounds so
good; but listeners do not come out of that service with a greater
admiration and appreciation of "What a Christ! What a Christ!" God is
indeed glorified in His Son (John 14:13). The question should thus be:
"Has Christ been depicted so real, so enthusiastically and so
passionately, as if He has just been crucified amid the listeners, for
their sakes?" (Gal. 3:1) Have people been touched and amazed by God's
unique, no-alternative salvation plan in Christ? Has the sermon awakened
people with an appreciation and better understanding and grasp of why He
hung there? That, when Christ hung there, He did it in my name, He
suffered on my behalf, He bore the penalty in my place, and that for
that reason I can now be reconciled to God? Until people have this
appreciation, worked in them by the Holy Spirit, for the Son of God, all
the good-sounding Biblical advice about marriage, faith, priesthood of
man, the situation in the country, etc. will be only superficial and
temporary. Christ is the essence of the matter, the axis around which
everything revolves.
2. Which Jesus is proclaimed?
On the spiritual market there are more than one
Jesus.
"For if he preaches another Jesus, whom we
have not preached, or if you receive another spirit, which you
have not received, or another gospel, which you have not
accepted, you might well bear with him." 2 Cor 11: 4
What does the other Jesus look like?
a) Jesus Christ always referred to His Father.
No fewer than 58 times does Jesus speaks about 'my Father',
e.g. "If
you loved me, you would rejoice, because I said I go unto
the Father: for My Father is greater than I."
John 14: 28.
It was not a Jesus loose from or out of the context of the
Trinity, without the Father and the Spirit. (Read the book
by T A Smail: 'The Forgotten Father') In other cases there
seems to be a 'bi-nity': always mention only of Jesus and
the Spirit. A Jesus who figures on his own is a cultic Jesus
– another Jesus.
b) Another Jesus is a sentimental Jesus.
Among unbelievers the other Jesus is marketed
unofficially as "Jesus loves you" or God loves you without
stating the other side. The intention is good, viz. to bring
lost people to believing, but it communicates the wrong
message to unbelievers who are living in sin. The message is
that a loving New Testamentical God will not punish sinners
nor send them to hell.
It is true that God is love, but the lost person must
understand how his sin affects his relationship with God.
That his sin makes him an enemy of God, and is a dividing
wall between him and God.
Only when a person understands that he is by nature a child
of the wrath and that his sin makes him an enemy of God
(that he is not just someone whom God loves!), will there be
an earnest and desperate desire and attempt to restore his
shattered relationship with God by breaking with sin.
That is the reason why people no longer fear God. The fear
of the Lord has become a strange concept, attributed to
"fire and brimstone" – preachers, and is a label for
fundamentalists. Jude (1:23) gives the seriousness with
which people must be warned, viz.
"others
save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even
the garment spotted by the flesh." This
'sentimental, loving Jesus' differs widely from the just God
who insists that the sinner must forsake his ways, and the
unrighteous man his thoughts, and let him return to the Lord
(Is 55:7), because God has overlooked the times of this
ignorance, but now commands all men to repent. (Acts 17:30)
It proclaims a strange and unbiblical concept of God.
Where are the messengers with a calling by God, who preach
in such a way that people will again have a devout respect
and reverence for God?!
c) The other gospel is a
cheap gospel. Special 'discount' is the trade-mark of
this 'discount gospel'. The discount is the lack of a
condition for breaking with and laying down sin. It is a
gospel without the essential counting of the cost. (Luke
14:28)
Very few evangelists and preachers today speak about
conversion from sin. People are invited to come for healing, or to make
a commitment or / and to be baptised without an appeal for breaking with
their sin first. Thousands put up their hands for a sentimental
'accepting Jesus' ceremony without heart-felt repentance and detailed
confession of specific sins. The unbiblical "sinner's prayer" where
people are prompted what they should pray, has given many a false
security that they have been reconciled to God on the grounds of such a
prayer. Such people are being misled and helped to a false conversion,
and after that they are declared to be saved on account of a prayer that
they prayed. After their so-called conversion or commitment nothing
changes! They remain in their old habits and addictive sins. They still
look and smell like the unsaved world.
Jesus sends the rich young man away first to set
right his sins before He can help him. Paul says the same: "Whereupon,
o king Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision, but showed
first unto the people of Damascus, and at Jerusalem, and throughout
Judea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent
(metanoia) and turn to God (metanoia) and do works meet for repentance
(metanoia)." (Acts 26:19)
"But what things were gain to me, those I counted
lost for Christ. Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the
excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have
suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may
win Christ, and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which
is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ."
(Phil. 3: 7 - 9)
It is not evangelisation to tell people: "Come to
God just as you are! Come with your filth!" No! Conversion is to
turn one's back on the things which grieve the Spirit of God. It might
mean getting out of a sinful relationship or breaking with addictive
sins. It might mean restitution, or to let go of sinful practices or to
break with bad habits. It might even mean converting myself from my idea
of reaching heaven by my good works. "Repent ye
therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the
times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord."
(Acts 3 : 19)
Is sin called by its name? Preaching about sin should
come into its right. People should be informed from the Bible that God
hates sin, and that sin puts a wall between God and man, and preachers
should see to it that people are clearly informed about sin. Those who
are not prepared to do it in God's way, let them rather remain silent.
There is no such thing as rebate for some preachers that they are spared
the pain of not speaking against sin because their ministry is
so-called 'different'.
There are certain sins which do not offend anyone,
such as certain general social anomalies which do not necessarily hurt.
Other sins would anger many people even if merely mentioned. Just try to
tell a karate instructor that karate is wrong! Just try telling someone
who makes his living from alternative healing such as homeopathy,
reflexology, yoga i.e.. that he is engaged in an occultic practice! There
will be an outcry!
Because some evangelists handle sin discreetly,
fearing that it will be offensive to listeners, the result is mass
conversions, huge churches and popular preachers. Jesus said:
"The world cannot hate you; but me it hates, because I
testify of it that its works are evil." (John 7 :
7) and "Remember the word that I said unto you:
the servant is not greater than his lord.
If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you."
(John 15:20)
"If the world hate you, know that it hated me before
it hated you." (John 15: 18)
"For everyone that does evil hates the light, neither
comes to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved ." (John
3 : 20)
3. Is the appeal made to the listener's logic or
to his emotions?
"I felt goose-pimples; I could not control my
emotions ...! Many wiped away tears. It was a wonderful experience being
with so many christians ..." etc.. We live in a time of spiritual
depression and of financial recession. People have an enormous need to
feel better, to experience a 'kick', rather than to come into the
correct relationship with God. An emotional experience that makes
someone feel better temporarily can easily be interpreted as a spiritual
experience and a meeting with God. This is a form of deception. The
truth sets people free. The working of the Holy Spirit and true revival
may never be separated from the Biblical Word with regards to Jesus
Christ, and the exposition of the Word. Jesus said in Jhn 6 : 63 "It
is the spirit that quickens; the flesh profits nothing: the words
that I speak unto you, they are the spirit,
and they are life." (Jhn 6 : 63)
Paul says in Rom. 1:16 that the gospel is the power of God unto
salvation for everyone that believes. In Eph. 1:13 Paul refers to
the gospel as the "word of truth, the gospel of your salvation". The
Spirit works by means of the Word! Nothing can replace the life-giving
power of Scripture - not lovely music, healings, charismatic speakers
nor miracles! THE LIVING WORD IS, AND REMAINS, THE INCORRUPTIBLE SEED
WHEREBY GOD ORDAINED THAT MAN WILL BE BORN AGAIN (1 Pet. 1:23) . People
need to understand, Jesus says in Mat.13:19 "When any one hears the
word of the kingdom and understands it not, then the wicked one
comes and catches away that which was sown in his heart. This is
he which received seed by the way side."
Eph. 1:17-19 : "That the God of our Lord Jesus
Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and
revelation in the knowledge of Him: the eyes of your understanding being
enlightened; that you may know what is the hope of his calling, and what
the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints; and what is
the exceeding greatness of his power to us who believe, according to the
working of his mighty power."
If people do not really understand through the
working of the Holy Spirit, nor have appreciation of the crucified and
risen Christ, no lasting change of lives will distinguish such a
series of services. Superficial and short-lived conversion is usually
the fruit of transient seed (nice music, healings, speakers’ charisma or
miracles) which has been sown.
4. Since when is the truth popular?
We easily say: "It's revival." Is it truly revival?
When the Bible describes the last days as a time of great apostasy and
deception, can we easily accept more "It's revival?" Popularity and
large numbers do not necessarily signify revival, and are not synonymous
with the truth. A W Tozer made the remark: "It is scarcely possible in
most places to get anyone to attend a meeting where the only attraction
is God." For that reason any popular preacher who succeeds in drawing
huge crowds of people should be tested and questions be asked. "Jesus
has always had more fans than followers, and many people attracted by
his personality, fascinated by his power or impressed by his teaching
have never truly submitted to Him as the Lord of their lives." (J
Blanchard & Dan Lucarini: Can We Rock The Gospel?)
We have seen one after the other 'prophet' who came
in recent years and then after a while disappeared again. Some were
more, and others less, distinguishable as doubtful preachers or false
prophets. Time and again they are carried for a while by the attention
paid to them in the sensational media. Every time people are just being
misled again. When will we learn to test preachers by the criteria of
the Bible?
5. Is the preacher under authority?
The greatest responsibility that can be entrusted to
any person is the proclamation of the Word. Yet we find that many
preachers enter that field of ministry with little, and sometimes with
no Bible School training. That does not need to be a problem if he is
working under the umbrella of the superior knowledge of other
Christians. Paul advises Timothy in 2 Tim. 2:15 to show himself approved
unto God, a workman that does not need to be ashamed, and warns Timothy
against the heresy advocated by Himeneus and Philetus.
Anyone can err. For that reason it is necessary for
every preacher, evangelist or 'prophet' to work under authority,
supervision or an umbrella. Where this protection does not exist, there
could be the breeding-ground for haughtiness, arrogance, and heresy. The
value of a team is that they can be a corrective for one another. An
important question should therefore always be: "Under whose supervision
do you work?" Is the preacher a 'lone ranger'? Is he the only one who
preaches and prays for the ill? Is he alone the gifted channel of the
Holy Spirit? Is it only his name in magazines and on bill-boards? Isn't
his ministry merely an 'ego-trip'?
There are many examples of such "Humpty-Dumpty's",
situations where such a talented, gifted or anointed person is put high
on a pedestal en enjoys all the attention and publicity for a while, but
the end turns out to be 'a great fall'.
6. Is he radically 'charismatic'?
Within the charismatic movement there is a dirty
stream of water which makes many naïve Christians sick, deceives them
and brings them under the power and influence of another spirit. This
'spirit' detaches people from the Word of God, as new things are
proclaimed to be Biblical and part of a revival. In fact it is a revival
of the occult. Houses a.o. objects are anointed with oil. Retha Wiid
tells in the media how she anointed the shoes and underwear of her
husband who 'slept around' in order to get him out of his sinful
lifestyle. That is 'white magic', and not Biblical. John Hagee speaks
about 'popcorn christians'. Those are people who jump up like popcorn in
a service and then fall down. In spite of numerous Christian warnings
against some of the TBN preachers like Benny Hinn, Copeland, Hagin, etc.
- many naïve people cannot believe that there is something wrong with
their teaching. The problem is modern armchair Christians who sit in
front of TBN rather than sit in front of the Bible - as is fitting for
Bible students. Bible study is hard work, while TBN offers ready-made
fast-food. Those are Christians who no longer ask what the Word says,
but ask what Rodney H Brown and others say ...!
Jer. 17:5 "Thus
says the Lord: Cursed be the man that trusts in man, and makes flesh his
arm and his heart departs from the Lord."
"As we said before,
so say I now again: If any man preach any other gospel unto you than
that you have received, let him be accursed." Gal. 1:9
DB Dick
|
|